Why the study?
Does the fragmented QRS complex improve the detection of myocardial scar compared to the Q wave in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease?
Does the fragmented QRS complex improve the detection of myocardial scar compared to the Q wave in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease?
The fragmented QRS complex is not a reliable surrogate marker for myocardial scar, demonstrating poor sensitivity and a high false-positive rate compared to traditional Q waves.
Fragmented QRS should not guide scar assessment in CAD; cross-sectional data leave open any adjunctive diagnostic role.
OBJECTIVE: To study the association of the fragmented QRS complex versus the Q wave with myocardial scar and viability. BACKGROUND: A prior study has suggested that the fragmented QRS complex on an electrocardiogram (ECG) is a highly sensitive and specific marker of myocardial scar as detected by regional perfusion abnormalities on a nuclear stress test. There is no external validation of this data. METHODS: We correlated the ECG and nuclear perfusion images of 460 consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. The presence of fragmented QRS or Q waves in two contiguous ECG leads was correlated with major coronary artery distributions on nuclear perfusion imaging. RESULTS: For the 1842 evaluated territories, the fragmented QRS complex was not superior to the Q wave in detecting fixed or mixed myocardial defects. The fragmented QRS complex was associated with worse sensitivity (1.7%) in comparison to the Q wave (31.7%) for identifying myocardial scar. The fragmented QRS complex carried a higher false positive rate in patients with normal perfusion scans (15.8%, 221 segments), in comparison to Q waves (1.4%, 17 segments). CONCLUSION: In our study population, both the fragmented QRS and Q wave had poor sensitivity and specificity in detecting fixed or mixed myocardial scar. Larger studies are needed to evaluate fragmented QRS as a surrogate of myocardial scar before it can be incorporated into clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: