This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
IMPACTThis article is essential reading for audit practitioners, policy advisors, and public financial management specialists working in Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs), government ministries, and international development organizations. By comparing research-based audit (RBA) practices in China and Indonesia, it offers actionable insights into how evidence-driven methodologies can transform audit quality and governance outcomes. The authors present a practical framework to assess and strengthen institutional capacity in audit planning, data use, and policy integration. For practitioners, the findings demonstrate how context-specific adaptations can increase audit relevance, improve SDG monitoring, and support strategic reform. The article bridges theory and practice, offering a roadmap for SAIs to evolve from compliance checkers to strategic knowledge partners in public governance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gattang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: