Why the study?
Different definitions have been used for screening for rheumatic heart disease, prompting the need to determine the reliability and agreement of the 2012 World Heart Federation echocardiographic criteria.
Does the use of the 2012 WHF echocardiographic criteria provide reliable inter-rater and intra-rater agreement for diagnosing rheumatic heart disease?
Does the use of the 2012 WHF echocardiographic criteria provide reliable inter-rater and intra-rater agreement for diagnosing rheumatic heart disease?
The 2012 WHF echocardiographic criteria demonstrate substantial inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for diagnosing definite rheumatic heart disease, supporting their utility as a standardized screening tool.
Moderate reliability for no vs mild RHD differentiation leaves open need for standardized training before broad screening use.
OBJECTIVE: Different definitions have been used for screening for rheumatic heart disease (RHD). This led to the development of the 2012 evidence-based World Heart Federation (WHF) echocardiographic criteria. The objective of this study is to determine the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and agreement in differentiating no RHD from mild RHD using the WHF echocardiographic criteria. METHODS: A standard set of 200 echocardiograms was collated from prior population-based surveys and uploaded for blinded web-based reporting. Fifteen international cardiologists reported on and categorised each echocardiogram as no RHD, borderline or definite RHD. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was calculated using Cohen's and Fleiss' free-marginal multirater kappa (κ) statistics, respectively. Agreement assessment was expressed as percentages. Subanalyses assessed reproducibility and agreement parameters in detecting individual components of WHF criteria. RESULTS: Sample size from a statistical standpoint was 3000, based on repeated reporting of the 200 studies. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of diagnosing definite RHD was substantial with a kappa of 0.65 and 0.69, respectively. The diagnosis of pathological mitral and aortic regurgitation was reliable and almost perfect, kappa of 0.79 and 0.86, respectively. Agreement for morphological changes of RHD was variable ranging from 0.54 to 0.93 κ. CONCLUSIONS: The WHF echocardiographic criteria enable reproducible categorisation of echocardiograms as definite RHD versus no or borderline RHD and hence it would be a suitable tool for screening and monitoring disease progression. The study highlights the strengths and limitations of the WHF echo criteria and provides a platform for future revisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reményi et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: