Why the study?
Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of heart failure and MACCE, but the impact of vascular resistance on HF and MACCE incidence in subjects with cardiovascular risk factors and degenerative aortic valve stenosis needed evaluation.
Does increased arterial resistance predict heart failure and MACCE in patients with cardiovascular risk factors and degenerative aortic stenosis?
Does increased arterial resistance predict heart failure and MACCE in patients with cardiovascular risk factors and degenerative aortic stenosis?
Assessment of vascular resistance using resistive and pulsatile indices from carotid and vertebral arteries can aid in HF-MACCE risk stratification for patients with degenerative aortic stenosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports vascular resistance measurement for HF-MACCE stratification in DAS; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of heart failure (HF) and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate impact of vascular resistance on HF and MACCE incidence in subjects with cardiovascular risk factors (CRF) and degenerative aortic valve stenosis (DAS). METHODS: From January 2016 to December 2018, in 404 patients with cardiovascular disease, including 267 patients with moderate-to-severe DAS and 137 patients with CRF, mean values of resistive index (RI) and pulsatile index (PI) were obtained from carotid and vertebral arteries. Patients were followed-up for 2.5 years, for primary outcome of HF and MACCE episodes. RESULTS: RI and PI values in patients with DAS compared to CRF were significantly higher, with optimal cut-offs discriminating arterial resistance of ≥0.7 for RI (sensitivity: 80.5%, specificity: 78.8%) and ≥1.3 for PI (sensitivity: 81.3%, specificity: 79.6%). Age, female gender, diabetes, and DAS were all independently associated with increased resistance. During the follow-up period, 68 (16.8%) episodes of HF-MACCE occurred. High RI (odds ratio 1.25, 95% CI 1.13-1.37) and PI (odds ratio 1.21, 95% CI 1.10-1.34) were associated with risk of HF-MACCE. CONCLUSIONS: An accurate assessment of vascular resistance may be used for HF-MACCE risk stratification in patients with DAS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baran et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: