Why the study?
Congenital thrombophilias are biologically plausible contributors to CTEPH, yet their frequency and clinical impact remain uncertain.
Does the presence of congenital thrombophilia influence clinical phenotypes and surgical outcomes in adults with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension?
Does the presence of congenital thrombophilia influence clinical phenotypes and surgical outcomes in adults with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension?
Congenital thrombophilias affect roughly 1 in 7 CTEPH patients but do not appear to worsen hemodynamic severity, surgical candidacy, or short-term survival, reinforcing that genetic status should not delay referral for definitive reperfusion therapies.
Thrombophilia status should not influence surgical decisions in CTEPH; extends prevalence data without short-term outcome effects.
Background and Objectives: Congenital thrombophilias are biologically plausible contributors to chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), yet their frequency and clinical impact remain uncertain. We undertook a systematic review to (i) estimate the pooled prevalence of specific hereditary defects among adults with CTEPH, (ii) characterise associated demographic and haemodynamic phenotypes, and (iii) summarise peri-operative and survival outcomes after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) or balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) in genetically defined subgroups. Methods: A protocol compliant with PRISMA-2020 was registered prospectively on the Open Science Framework (OSF). PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 1 June 2025 using validated, PRESS-reviewed strings combining CTEPH and thrombophilia terms. Observational cohorts, case–control studies and trials reporting laboratory-confirmed congenital thrombophilias in adults with right-heart-catheter-defined CTEPH were eligible. Results: Eight studies encompassing 677 unique CTEPH patients met the inclusion criteria. Among the 400 individuals screened for deficiencies of the natural anticoagulant pathways, 56 possessed a defect: protein S deficiency 5.3% (21/400; 95% CI 3.3–8.0), protein C deficiency 4.3% (17/400; 2.5–6.8), and antithrombin deficiency 1.5% (6/400; 0.6–3.3). In 520 genotyped patients, factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A were infrequent (1.3% and 1.0%, respectively) and confined to European/North American cohorts. Baseline haemodynamics were uniformly severe (mean mPAP 46.7 mm Hg; pulmonary vascular resistance ≈ 9 WU). Definitive reperfusion therapy was common (PEA 63%; BPA 18%), reducing mPAP to 20.5 mm Hg and yielding a weighted one-year survival of 96.2%. No study demonstrated a thrombophilia-specific effect on surgical candidacy or early survival. Conclusions: Approximately one in seven patients with CTEPH harbours a congenital thrombophilia, most often protein S or protein C deficiency, whereas classic venous-thrombo-embolism mutations are rare and ethnically restricted. Current evidence indicates that genetic status does not materially influence haemodynamic severity, uptake of PEA/BPA, or short-term survival, supporting guideline recommendations for universal referral to specialist reperfusion centres. Future multicentre registries integrating systematic genotyping and long-term outcome capture are needed to clarify genotype-specific prognostic and therapeutic implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borsi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: