Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective case-control study reveals that an extracellular vesicle scoring assay detects residual hepatocellular carcinoma, suggesting potential to augment cross-sectional imaging.
BACKGROUND: There are no validated biomarkers for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment response (TR). Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are promising circulating biomarkers that may detect minimal residual disease in patients with treated HCC. METHODS: We developed the HCC EV TR Score using HCC EV Digital Scoring Assay involving click chemistry-mediated enrichment of HCC EVs, followed by absolute quantification of HCC EV-specific genes by RT-digital PCR. Six HCC EV-specific genes were selected and validated through i) a comprehensive data analysis pipeline with an unprecedentedly large collection of liver transcriptome datasets (n = 9,160), ii) RNAscope validation on HCC tissues (n = 6), and iii) a pilot study on early- or intermediate-stage HCC and liver cirrhosis patients (n = 70). The performance of HCC EV TR Score was assessed in a phase-2 retrospective case-control study (n = 100). RESULTS: HCC EV TR Scores, calculated from pre- and post-treatment plasma samples in the phase-2 case-control study, accurately differentiated post-treatment viable from nonviable HCC in the training (area under the ROC curve [AUROC] of 0.90, n = 49) and validation set (AUROC of 0.88, n = 51). At an optimal cutoff of 0.76 identified in the training set, HCC EV TR Score had high accuracy in detecting viable tumors (sensitivity: 76.5%, specificity: 88.2%) and found residual disease not initially observed on MRI in six patients with a median lead time of 63 days. CONCLUSIONS: This EV-based digital scoring approach shows great promise to augment cross-sectional imaging for the assessment of HCC treatment response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: