Why the study?
Hereditary nemaline myopathy is one of the most common congenital myopathies, prompting analysis of the mutational spectrum and phenotypic features in Chinese patients.
NEB is the most frequent causative gene for hereditary nemaline myopathy in the Chinese population, with a highly variable genetic spectrum and a specific hotspot splicing mutation.
Broadens NEB mutational spectrum in NM; leaves open clinical adoption pending larger validation studies.
Hereditary nemaline myopathy (NM) is one of the most common congenital myopathies with the histopathological findings of nemaline bodies. We used targeted next-generation sequencing to identify causative mutations in 48 NM patients with confirmed myopathological diagnosis, analyze the mutational spectrum and phenotypic features. Furthermore, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to confirm the pathogenic effect of one nebulin (NEB) splicing variant. The results showed that variants were found in five NM-associated genes, including NEB, actin alpha 1 (ACTA1), troponin T1, Kelch repeat and BTB domain-containing 13, and cofilin-2, in 34 (73.9%), 7 (15.2%), 3 (6.5%), 1 (2.2%), and 1 (2.2%) patients, respectively, in a total of 46/48 (95.8%) NM patients. Of the total 64 variants identified, 51 were novel variants including 26 pathogenic, 1 probably pathogenic, and 24 variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Notably, one NEB splicing mutation, c.21417+3A>G causing exon 144 splicing (NM_001164508.1), as confirmed by RT-PCR, was found in 52.9% (18 patients) of NEB variant-carrying patients. Typical congenital NM, the most common clinical subtype (60.4%), was associated with five NM genes. We concluded that hereditary NM showed a highly variable genetic spectrum. NEB was the most frequent causative gene in this Chinese cohort, followed by ACTA1. We found a hotspot splicing mutation in NEB among Chinese cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: