Why the study?
Does an initial all-out sprint improve 1500-m cycling time trial performance and oxygen uptake kinetics in recreationally active men?
Does an initial all-out sprint improve 1500-m cycling time trial performance and oxygen uptake kinetics in recreationally active men?
A brief 15-second all-out start improves 1500-m cycling time trial performance and oxygen uptake kinetics compared to a purely self-paced strategy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant trialing 15-s all-out starts in 1500-m cycling; extends RCT evidence on pacing strategies.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the duration of an "all-out" starting strategy on O2 uptake kinetics and performance during high-intensity exercise. Following familiarization, 9 recreationally active men completed three 1500-m cycling time trials (TT) using different pacing strategies. In a randomized order, subjects completed a self-paced TT (SPTT), or a TT that was self-paced following an initial 15-second (15TT) or 90-second (90TT) all-out sprint. VO2 was measured during all tests. The 1500-m TT completion time was faster in 15TT than SPTT (136.1 ± 6.2 seconds vs. 140.3 ± 7.1 seconds; p ≤ 0.05), but 90TT (138.5 ± 8.5 seconds) was not significantly different from either SPTT or 15TT (p > 0.05). The V[Combining Dot Above]O2 mean response time (MRT) was shorter in 15TT (27 ± 7 seconds) and 90TT (30 ± 9 seconds) than SPTT (40 ± 10 seconds; p ≤ 0.05), but the peak V[Combining Dot Above]O2 was only higher in 15TT (3.77 ± 0.42 L·min-1) compared with SPTT (3.47 ± 0.44 L·min-1) (p ≤ 0.05). There was a significant correlation (r = 0.77, p ≤ 0.05) between the shorter MRT and the faster 1500-m completion time for 15TT compared with SPTT. These results support the use of a brief (∼15 seconds) all-out start to improve performance in short-duration (<180 seconds) athletic events and suggest that such a strategy may be ergogenic by increasing the rate of oxidative energy transfer during exercise while minimizing the extent of the concurrent muscle metabolic perturbation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wood et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: