Key result
Fast-start pacing fails to magnify the benefits of priming exercise on VO2 kinetics and performance.
Why the study?
The independent and additive effects of prior heavy-intensity exercise and pacing strategies on VO2 kinetics and high-intensity exercise performance in trained cyclists were unclear.
Does a fast-start pacing strategy magnify the positive effects of priming exercise on VO2 kinetics and high-intensity exercise performance in trained cyclists?
RCT (n=14)
Open-label
Randomized order
No
Does a fast-start pacing strategy magnify the positive effects of priming exercise on VO2 kinetics and high-intensity exercise performance in trained cyclists?
Absolute Event Rate: 27% vs 32%
p-value: p=<0.001
In trained endurance cyclists, a fast-start pacing strategy does not magnify the positive effects of priming exercise on VO2 kinetics and short-term high-intensity performance.
Fast-start pacing should not be adopted to augment priming in cyclists; hypothesis-generating for VO2 kinetics optimization.
The purpose of this study was to determine both the independent and additive effects of prior heavy-intensity exercise and pacing strategies on the VO2 kinetics and performance during high-intensity exercise. Fourteen endurance cyclists (VO2max = 62.8 ± 8.5 mL.kg-1.min-1) volunteered to participate in the present study with the following protocols: 1) incremental test to determine lactate threshold and VO2max; 2) four maximal constant-load tests to estimate critical power; 3) six bouts of exercise, using a fast-start (FS), even-start (ES) or slow-start (SS) pacing strategy, with and without a preceding heavy-intensity exercise session (i.e., 90% critical power). In all conditions, the subjects completed an all-out sprint during the final 60 s of the test as a measure of the performance. For the control condition, the mean response time was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) for FS (27 ± 4 s) than for ES (32 ± 5 s) and SS (32 ± 6 s). After the prior exercise, the mean response time was not significantly different among the paced conditions (FS = 24 ± 5 s; ES = 25 ± 5 s; SS = 26 ± 5 s). The end-sprint performance (i.e., mean power output) was only improved (∼ 3.2%, p<0.01) by prior exercise. Thus, in trained endurance cyclists, an FS pacing strategy does not magnify the positive effects of priming exercise on the overall VO2 kinetics and short-term high-intensity performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caritá et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Healthy trained endurance cyclists (n=14). Fast-start pacing strategy and prior heavy-intensity exercise vs. Even-start and slow-start pacing strategies was evaluated on Mean response time of VO2 kinetics (p=<0.001). A fast-start pacing strategy does not magnify the positive effects of priming exercise on overall VO2 kinetics and short-term high-intensity performance in trained endurance cyclists.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: