Why the study?
Does Growth Hormone replacement improve protein metabolism and fat-free mass in GH-deficient adults?
Does Growth Hormone replacement improve protein metabolism and fat-free mass in GH-deficient adults?
GH replacement in GH-deficient adults acutely improves protein balance by stimulating synthesis and inhibiting catabolism, leading to a new homeostasis that maintains a net gain in fat-free mass at 6 months.
GH may enhance protein anabolism and FFM in deficient adults; leaves open durability, safety, and need for RCTs before practice change.
Reduced fat-free mass (FFM) in GH-deficient (GHD) adults is improved by GH replacement, but the protein metabolic changes are unclear. Using iv [(2)H(3)]leucine and oral l-[(13)C(1)]leucine infusions and dual emission x-ray absorptiometry, we compared leucine kinetics and body composition in eight GHD adults and eight healthy controls in the fasted and fed states, before and after 2 wk and 6 months of GH replacement. Leucine kinetics were not different between pretreatment GHD subjects and controls. After 2 wk of GH treatment, leucine oxidation decreased in the GHD subjects compared with baseline values [fasted, 41 +/- 6 vs. 30 +/- 5 micromol/kg FFM.h (P < 0.01); fed, 49 +/- 3 vs. 41 +/- 3.6 micromol/kg FFM.h (P < 0.05)], leucine balance improved [fasted, -14 +/- 4 vs. -3.5 +/- 3 micromol/kg FFM.h (P < 0.01); fed, 65 +/- 10 vs. 72 +/- 7 micromol/kg FFM.h (P = 0.07)], and protein synthesis increased [fasted, 116 +/- 5 vs. 131 +/- 6 micromol/kg FFM.h (P < 0.05); fed, 103 +/- 6 vs. 116 +/- 6 micromol/kg FFM.h (P < 0.05)]. After 6 months of GH treatment, these changes were not maintained in the fed state. The five GHD subjects with decreased FFM at baseline showed a significant increase after 6 months of GH treatment (P < 0.05). GH replacement in GHD acutely improves protein balance by stimulating synthesis and inhibiting catabolism. After 6 months, protein kinetics reached a new homeostasis to maintain the net gain in FFM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: