Does chelerythrine reduce ischemic injury and intracellular sodium overload in isolated rat hearts?
Pharmacological inhibition of PKC with chelerythrine protects isolated rat hearts from ischemic injury by increasing Na-K-ATPase activity and reducing intracellular sodium overload.
Myocardial ischemia results in an increase in intracellular sodium concentration (Nai), which may lead to cellular injury via cellular swelling and calcium overload. Because protein kinase C (PKC) has been shown to reduce Na-K-ATPase activity, we postulated that pharmacological inhibition of PKC would directly increase Na-K-ATPase activity, reduce Nai during ischemia, and provide protection from ischemic injury. Isolated rat hearts were subjected to 30 min of global ischemia with and without the specific PKC inhibitor chelerythrine. Intracellular pH, ATP, and Nai were assessed using 31P and 23Na NMR spectroscopy, whereas Na-K-ATPase and PKC activity were determined using biochemical assays. Na/H exchanger activity was determined using the ammonium prepulse technique under nonischemic conditions. Chelerythrine increased Na-K-ATPase activity (13.76 +/- 0.89 vs. 10.89 +/- 0.80 mg ADP. h(-1). mg protein(-1); P = 0.01), reduced PKC activity in both the membrane and cytosolic fractions (39% and 28% of control, respectively), and reduced creatine kinase release on reperfusion (48 +/- 5 IU/g dry wt vs. 689 +/- 63 IU/g dry wt; P = 0.008). The rise in Na(i) during ischemia was significantly reduced in hearts treated with chelerythrine (peak Na(i) chelerythrine: 21.5 +/- 1.2 mM; control: 31.9 +/- 1.2 mM; P < 0.0001), without an effect on either acidosis (nadir pH 6.16 +/- 0.05 for chelerythrine vs. 6.08 +/- 0.04 for control), the rate of ATP depletion or Na/H exchanger activity. These data support the hypothesis that pharmacological inhibition of PKC before ischemia induces cardioprotection by reducing intracellular sodium overload via an increase in Na-K-ATPase activity.
Lundmark et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: