Why the study?
Early aspirin withdrawal in P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy regimens may raise concerns in high-risk patients undergoing complex PCI.
Does P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT improve efficacy and safety outcomes compared to standard DAPT in patients undergoing complex versus non-complex PCI?
Does P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT improve efficacy and safety outcomes compared to standard DAPT in patients undergoing complex versus non-complex PCI?
P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 1-3 months of DAPT reduces bleeding across all PCI patients and decreases myocardial infarction specifically in those undergoing complex PCI compared to standard 12-month DAPT.
P2Y12i monotherapy after 1–3 months DAPT preserves ischemic outcomes while cutting major bleeding in complex PCI; extends RCT evidence to high-risk patients.
Background Monotherapy with P2Y12 inhibitors (P2Y12i) is emerging as alternative strategy to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, early withdrawal of aspirin as part of P2Y12i monotherapy regimens may pose concerns in high-risk patients, such as those undergoing complex PCI. Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of P2Y12i monotherapy after a short course of DAPT (1- to 3-month) compared with standard DAPT (≥12-month) according to PCI complexity. Methods We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials using random effects models to combine hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). No restrictions were applied to the type of P2Y12 receptor inhibitor (clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) or to the definition of complex PCI. Within-trial interactions were pooled to estimate heterogeneity between complex and noncomplex PCI strata. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42021291027). Results We screened 7,502 unique citations, of which 2,948 were screened at title and abstract level and 576 were judged potentially eligible for full-text assessment. We included in the analysis five trials (1–5) enrolling 31,627 patients, of whom 8,328 (26.3%) underwent complex PCI; characteristics of trials and patient populations are summarized in Table 1. Risk estimates for efficacy and safety outcomes associated with P2Y12i monotherapy and standard DAPT across studies included in the analysis, stratified by complex and noncomplex PCI, are reported in Figure 1. P2Y12i monotherapy compared with standard DAPT was associated with a similar risk of all-cause death, stent thrombosis, and stroke, with no evidence for interaction between complex and noncomplex PCI. We found heterogeneity in the treatment effect of P2Y12i monotherapy vs. standard DAPT with respect to myocardial infarction (P-interaction=0.027). Compared with standard DAPT, P2Y12i monotherapy decreased the risk of myocardial infarction in complex PCI (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60–0.99, P=0.042), but not in noncomplex PCI patients (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.90–1.30, P=0.382). The risk of major bleeding was significantly reduced by P2Y12i monotherapy with a consistent treatment effect (P-interaction=0.699) in both complex and noncomplex PCI strata. Conclusions Patients undergoing complex PCI may derive more benefit and less harm from P2Y12i monotherapy after early aspirin withdrawal compared with standard DAPT, resulting in decreased risks of myocardial infarction and bleeding. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliva et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: