Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The acquisition patterns of 3-D surveys often have a significant effect on the results of dip moveout (DMO) or prestack migration. When the spatial distribution of input traces is irregular, results from DMO and migration are contaminated by artifacts. In many cases, the footprint of the acquisition patterns can be seen on the migrated section and may result in incorrect interpretation. This phenomena also has a very significant effect on the feasibility of conducting amplitude variation with offset (AVO) analysis after 3-D prestack migration or after 3-D DMO, and also may affect velocity analysis. We propose a simple enhancement to migration and DMO programs that acts to minimize acquisition artifacts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Canning et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: