Quantifies carbon flux trends in agricultural areas, suggesting significant erosion impacts.
Anthropogenic land cover change (ALCC) is a primary driver of global carbon cycle perturbation, yet its millennial-scale impacts remain poorly quantified. It profoundly alters carbon cycling through its dual effects on soil erosion and vegetation productivity. Here, we quantify for the first time, millennial-scale (5000–100 BP) carbon flux trends and their driving mechanisms in the Wei River catchment, a critical agricultural region within the Chinese Loess Plateau (CLP) and a major tributary of the Yellow River. Our coupling modeling approach, which combines landscape evolution modeling with machine-learning methods, reveals that ALCC has dominated carbon budgets for millennia by simultaneously increasing lateral soil organic carbon (SOC) export and suppressing vertical CO 2 sequestration: ALCC-induced soil erosion has caused a significant lateral SOC loss (ranging from 0.76 to 8.8 Mt C yr −1 ) since 5000 BP. It exceeds contemporaneous atmospheric carbon uptake through vegetation by a factor of 1.2 – 4.1. The latter has cumulatively declined by 35.3% in response to ALCC-induced decline in net primary production (NPP). As a result, the catchment experiences a net carbon change ranging from −5.3 Mt C yr −1 (net loss) to 0.2 Mt C yr −1 (net uptake). However, since ∼ 98% of exported carbon is stored in the lower Yellow River, and ultimately, the Bohai Sea, the overall source-to-sink river system act as a carbon sink. Critically, the effectiveness of this overall-sink has been decreasing since 5000 BP due to the vegetation-uptake decrease in response to land use change. Our work provides long-term insights for soil carbon management strategies in regions with historical agricultural legacies and highlights the necessity of integrating erosion and productivity feedbacks in assessing terrestrial carbon budgets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: