Measures purchasing power erosion in middle-income households, indicating conventional strategies fail to build wealth.
Standard portfolio theory evaluates real asset returns by deflating nominal yields using officialgovernment price indices, primarily the Consumer Price Index (CPI). This paper demonstrates thatthis conventional framework relies on a fundamental statistical mismatch for middle-incomehouseholds. Official CPI calculations aggregate a broad, hedonic-adjusted basket of goods—includingdiscretionary electronics, automotive equipment, and apparel—that artificially depresses headlineinflation metrics. Concurrently, middle-income households face highly inelastic spending structuresheavily concentrated in essential categories: food, utilities, housing, and healthcare (the "SustenanceBasket").By introducing the Essential Price Index (EPI) and the Hedonic Inflation Gap (HIG), weformulate a quantitative model proving that conventional conservative portfolios (yielding 5%–7%nominal returns) operate at a net-negative real return when evaluated against true householdexpenditure velocity. We conclude that traditional asset allocation strategies do not accumulatewealth, but merely obscure a slow, systematic erosion of purchasing power.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Min Jinseong (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: