This article revisits velar palatalisation mechanisms in a dialect, indicating significant phonological shifts.
This article revisits a mechanism of the first two primary palatalisations of velar stops before unrounded front vowels and in the clusters *ki̯ and *gi̯ in Common Slavic. I ground the discussion in the analysis of the new acoustic data from Kryvorivnja (Southeast Hutsul) Ukrainian that I collected during my 2019–2022 fieldwork in the Carpathian Mountains. Similar to Common Slavic, the Kryvorivnja dialect lacks a phonological contrast between /k/ and /k j / and highly ranks one and the same phonological constraint, namely, the tendency towards intrasyllabic harmony Constraint, which is responsible for, e.g., velar palatalisation in Common Slavic. I show how this constraint changed from a constraint on surface forms in Common Slavic to a constraint on underlying forms in the Kryvorivnja dialect. I argue that the intermediate stages for the primary velar stop palatalisation were ambiguous [k j ∼t j ] and [g j ∼d j ], consequently targeted by spirantisation, and that, having become allophones of /t/ and /d/, they imposed the later primary palatalisation of the Proto-Ukrainian *ti̯, *di̯ sequences. In turn, the surfacing of /t j / → [k j ∼t j ] 2 and /d j / → [g j ∼d j ] 2 in the Kryvorivnja dialect illustrates the case of hyper-correction based on [k j ∼t j ] 1 attributed to the fourth palatalisation of velars.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Оксана Лебедівна (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: