Demonstrates improved plough layer thickness mapping in Hubei Province, indicating better soil management strategies.
Accurate prediction of plough layer thickness (PLT) in cropland is essential for soil quality assessment and sustainable land management, yet regional-scale PLT mapping remains challenging because PLT is a subsurface structural attribute that cannot be directly retrieved from surface spectral signals. This study developed an interpretable framework for province-scale mapping of cropland plough layer thickness (PLT) in Hubei Province, China, by integrating multi-source remote sensing observations, including Landsat 8 optical spectral bands, Sentinel-1 SAR backscatter, and crop dynamic spectral response metrics derived from multi-year Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) time series, together with topographic, climatic, soil physicochemical, and land-use variables. A total of 1926 cropland soil samples were used to train and validate random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and Cubist models, while prediction uncertainty was quantified using 90% prediction intervals. The relative contributions of different environmental variable groups were assessed, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were used to interpret key predictors. The all-variable scenario achieved the best overall performance, with RF showing the highest accuracy (R2 = 0.46; RMSE = 3.12 cm) and the narrowest prediction interval. Climatic and topographic factors dominated PLT spatial variability, whereas other variable groups provided complementary predictive information. These findings demonstrate the potential of integrating multi-source environmental data and interpretable machine learning for regional PLT mapping, and the mapped distribution of cropland PLT provides a spatial basis for cropland quality assessment and targeted soil management, although further improvements will require spatially explicit agricultural management information and more direct PLT-related predictors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: