Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conceptual framework introduces relational happiness analysis through affective appraisal in relationships, suggesting future empirical testing.
This conceptual preprint proposes the Relational Happiness Discrepancy Model (RHDM), a mathematical framework for analysing event-level affective appraisal in interpersonal relationships. The model distinguishes realised relational affect from expectation discrepancy and introduces social presence as an estimable modulation rather than a fixed physical-presence multiplier. It further replaces an earlier sign-inconsistent hope–trust extension with a bounded negative-discrepancy buffer. The core appraisal equation is A = (R − E)₊ − [1 − λB(P,T)](E − R)₊, with R = nx and (z)₊ = max(z,0). A broader discrepancy-adjusted index is H* = R + κA. The framework is situated alongside expectancy-disconfirmation theory, reward-prediction-error models of momentary subjective well-being, affective forecasting, social-interaction research, hope theory and interpersonal trust. This Version 1 manuscript is conceptual. It is not peer-reviewed and reports no original participant data. Its mathematical propositions and behavioural hypotheses are intended for future empirical testing using repeated event-level or experience-sampling data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith Mwivali Amanya (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: