Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We welcome Paul Smith's and Peter Ackers' responses to our article on change in trade unions, which was written deliberately in order to stimulate debate, and we acknowledge the constructive tone of their criticism. In making our reply we have chosen to concentrate on Smith's critique, partly because he has more critical comments to make, and partly because he has developed his criticism from within a particular tradition of radical industrial relations writing which is influential among academic students of British trade unionism. We felt it would be of most
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heery et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: