Effect of oral anticoagulation therapy in atrial fibrillation patients with a history of intracranial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients surviving intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) represents a challenge due to the difficult balance between thrombosis and hemorrhage. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of OACs resumption in AF patients with a history of ICH during long-term follow-up. The outcome measures were ischemic stroke (IS), IS or systemic embolism (SE), all-cause death, recurrent ICH and major bleeding. Meta-analyses of pooled odds ratios (ORs) were conducted with random-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 9 observational studies were included, covering 18,115 patients with AF and a history of ICH. The risk of IS was not statistically different between the group of patients receiving OAC therapy and the no-OAC group (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.16 to 1.0, P=0.05). The rate of IS or SE (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.70, P=0.0008), all-cause death (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.70, I2=42%, P<0.00001) were significantly decreased in patients receiving OAC therapy compared to those with no-OAC therapy. The pooled OR estimates for ICH recurrence (OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.94 to 2.26, P=0.09) and major bleeding (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.86 to 2.11, P=0.19) were not significantly increased in the OAC therapy group. There was heterogeneity between the results of observational studies and RCTs in terms of all-cause death (I2=83.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the heterogeneity in results between observational studies and RCTs, as well as the limited number and small size of RCTs, high grade evidences are needed. Pooled analysis is required when more RCTs are completed in the future to resolve this therapeutic dilemma.