Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIM: To compare Actigraph-defined moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) cutpoints among children, combining statistical and biobehavioural analyses. METHODS: One hundred and thirteen children aged 10.0 +/- 0.8 years wore accelerometer for three days. The time they spent in MVPA was estimated using 10 thresholds ranged from 3000 to 3900 cpm. A statistical construct including 45 Bland and Altman pairwise analyses was used to compare the 10 estimates of MVPA. A regression was performed to develop an equation relating mean differences to the between-cutpoint gaps. RESULTS: Mean differences in the MVPA estimates ranged from 1.6 to 12.8 min as a function of increment. Raw estimates of MVPA decreased according to an arithmetic sequence with a common difference of 200 cpm. This difference translates into a drop of 12% in MVPA and a misclassification of up to 5% of children. Mean differences (Y) could be predicted from increments (X) using: Y= 0.02 X (R(2)= 0.99, SEE = 0.72, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: When a lack of agreement should be assumed as the between-cutpoint gap exceeds 200 cpm, statistical differences may occur earlier at 90 cpm. Yet, the current equation makes it possible to compare and adjust results from studies/interventions using diverse cutpoints for MVPA among children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guinhouya et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: