Cohort study finds equivalent clinical stability between short and extended antibiotic durations in hospital-acquired pneumonia, supporting guidelines recommending seven-day treatment.
Background The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends a 7-day duration of antimicrobial therapy for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP); however, this recommendation is based on low-quality evidence. This recommendation is supported by evidence from ventilator-associated pneumonia clinical trials. Use of guideline-recommended antimicrobial durations is variable in clinical practice owing to the lack of literature available. Methods This was a retrospective, cohort, single-center study. Adult patients admitted with a diagnosis of HAP and received at least 72 hours of antimicrobial therapy were included. The primary outcome was day 7 clinical stability in patients treated with standard (≤7 days) compared with extended (>7 days) duration antimicrobial therapy. Secondary outcomes included hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), 30-day mortality, and 30-day hospital readmission rates. Results Fifty-three patient encounters were identified. Thirty-two patients (60.4%) received standard duration (6 [4.5–7] days) antimicrobial therapy, and 21 patients (39.6%) received extended duration (14 [11–14] days) antimicrobial therapy ( P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between groups with respect to day 7 clinical stability (62.5% vs 47.6%; P = 0.29), hospital LOS (9 [7–16] days vs 12 [7.5–24] days; P = 0.29), intensive care unit LOS (5 [3.5–9.5] days vs 5 [3–20] days; P = 0.62), 30-day mortality (3.1% vs 9.5%; P = 0.56), or 30-day readmission rates (21.9% vs 38.1%; P = 0.2). Conclusions No differences were observed in clinical outcomes between antimicrobial treatment groups. Guideline-recommended durations of antimicrobial therapy should be used in patients with HAP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petite et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: