Key result
Patient-specific finite element simulations of TAVI closely matched post-operative clinical data, with a mean percentage difference of 1.79% for orifice area and 3.67% for eccentricity.
Why the study?
The study was designed to validate a novel workflow for implementing patient-specific finite element simulations to virtually replicate the TAVI procedure.
Does patient-specific finite element simulation accurately replicate the final stent configuration in patients undergoing TAVI?
Does patient-specific finite element simulation accurately replicate the final stent configuration in patients undergoing TAVI?
Patient-specific finite element simulations of TAVI procedures closely match post-operative clinical data, offering a reliable tool for personalized pre-operative planning.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Patient-specific FE TAVI simulations show technical feasibility; leaves open prospective validation before any clinical use.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to validate a novel workflow for implementing patient-specific finite element (FE) simulations to virtually replicate the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) procedure. METHODS: Seven patients undergoing TAVI were enrolled. Patient-specific anatomical models were reconstructed from pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans and subsequentially discretized, considering the native aortic leaflets and calcifications. Moreover, high-fidelity models of CoreValve Evolut R and Acurate Neo2 valves were built. To determine the most suitable material properties for the two stents, an accurate calibration process was undertaken. This involved conducting crimping simulations and fine-tuning Nitinol parameters to fit experimental force-diameter curves. Subsequently, FE simulations of TAVI procedures were conducted. To validate the reliability of the implemented implantation simulations, qualitative and quantitative comparisons with post-operative clinical data, such as angiographies and CT scans, were performed. RESULTS: For both devices, the simulation curves closely matched the experimental data, indicating successful validation of the valves mechanical behaviour. An accurate qualitative superimposition with both angiographies and CTs was evident, proving the reliability of the simulated implantation. Furthermore, a mean percentage difference of 1,79 ± 0,93 % and 3,67 ± 2,73 % between the simulated and segmented final configurations of the stents was calculated in terms of orifice area and eccentricity, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study shows the successful validation of TAVI simulations in patient-specific anatomies, offering a valuable tool to optimize patients care through personalized pre-operative planning. A systematic approach for the validation is presented, laying the groundwork for enhanced predictive modeling in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grossi et al. (2024) studied Aortic valve disease requiring TAVI (n=7). Patient-specific finite element (FE) simulations vs. Post-operative clinical data (angiographies and CT scans) was evaluated on Mean percentage difference between simulated and segmented final configurations of the stents in terms of orifice area and eccentricity. Patient-specific finite element simulations of TAVI closely matched post-operative clinical data, with a mean percentage difference of 1.79% for orifice area and 3.67% for eccentricity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: