Why the study?
Does early achievement of TIMI-3 flow with intravenous thrombolysis alone reduce myocardial damage compared to thrombolysis requiring adjuvant intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Population
195 patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting after 30 min of continuous symptoms but within 12…
Comparison
Intravenous thrombolysis alone vs Thrombolysis plus adjuvant percutaneous coronary…
Design
Cohort, Alternately assigned for the FAST II sub-trial; the FAST I trial was…
Follow-up
30 days
Authors
Loading...
May limit myocardial injury in AMI; hypothesis-generating for thrombolysis-first strategies and requires randomized confirmation.
Does early achievement of TIMI-3 flow with intravenous thrombolysis alone reduce myocardial damage compared to thrombolysis requiring adjuvant intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Early restoration of TIMI-3 flow by intravenous thrombolysis alone significantly reduces myocardial damage compared to delayed reperfusion requiring adjuvant PCI in acute myocardial infarction.
Nagao et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: