Key result
Postoperative care in a 24-hour Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU24) did not increase the rate of postoperative complications (50.0% vs 55.6%, p=0.670) compared to traditional intensive care.
Why the study?
Postoperative care in a 24-h Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU24) is increasingly suggested for patients undergoing multivisceral surgery for ovarian cancer, but whether this concept increases postoperative complications was unknown.
Does postoperative care in a PACU24 increase postoperative complications or length of hospital stay compared to classic intensive care in patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery?
Observational (n=87)
No
Does postoperative care in a PACU24 increase postoperative complications or length of hospital stay compared to classic intensive care in patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 50% vs 55.6%
p-value: p=0.670
Postoperative care in a 24-hour Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU24) is a safe and resource-saving alternative to traditional intensive care for patients undergoing complex cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer.
PACU24 may increase complications after ovarian cancer cytoreduction; leaves open safety without randomized trials.
Introduction: Patients with ovarian cancer who undergo multivisceral surgery usually require intensive care monitoring postoperatively. In view of the ever-fewer numbers of high-care/intensive care beds and the introduction of fast-track treatment concepts, it is increasingly being suggested that these patients should be cared for postoperatively in 24-h Post Anesthesia Care Units (PACU24). No analyses have been carried out to date to investigate whether such a postoperative care concept might be associated with a potential increase in postoperative complications in this patient cohort. Methods: (PACU group) the introduction of this care concept was carried out, with a particular focus on postoperative complications and secondary admission to an intensive care unit where necessary. Results: The data of 42 patients were analyzed for the PACU group and 45 patients for the control group. According to the analysis, the preoperative and surgical data of both groups were comparable (age, ASA, BMI, FIGO stage, duration of surgery, blood loss). The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM score) as a measure for the risk of postoperative complications was higher in the PACU group (11.1% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.001). Patients in the PACU group underwent bowel resection with anastomosis significantly more often (76.3% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001), although the extent of surgery was otherwise comparable. The total number, type and severity of postoperative complications and the duration of the overall stay in hospital did not differ between the two groups. None of the patients required secondary transfer from the PACU or normal ward to an intensive care unit (ICU). Summary: Our data support the assumption that the care concept of transferring patients to a PACU24 represents a safe and cost-saving care pathway for the postoperative care of patients even after complex gynecological-oncological procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reuter et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Advanced ovarian cancer (n=87). 24-hour Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU24) concept vs. Classic postoperative care in a high-care intensive care unit (ICU) was evaluated on Postoperative complications (p=0.670). Postoperative care in a 24-hour Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU24) did not increase the rate of postoperative complications (50.0% vs 55.6%, p=0.670) compared to traditional intensive care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: