Key result
Ivabradine plus conventional treatment significantly reduced mean heart rate over 36 months compared to conventional treatment alone in heart transplant recipients (P < .01).
Why the study?
Heart transplant recipients typically have elevated heart rates of 90-110 bpm due to denervation, prompting investigators to test whether the If-channel antagonist ivabradine could safely and effectively lower heart rate in this population.
Does ivabradine added to conventional treatment reduce mean heart rate in heart transplant recipients?
RCT (n=35)
Open-label
randomized
Does ivabradine added to conventional treatment reduce mean heart rate in heart transplant recipients?
Ivabradine effectively and consistently reduces heart rate in heart transplant recipients without adversely affecting mortality or graft function.
Ivabradine safely lowers HR in HTx recipients; extends If-channel inhibition evidence to denervated hearts.
The absence of afferent nerves for heart rate (HR) regulation leaves the transplanted heart under the influence of its internal and hormonal control. The HR of heart transplantation (HTx) recipients varies from to 90-110 bpm, indicating a lack of vagal parasympathetic tone. We hypothesized that the reduction in mean HR using an If-channel antagonist (ivabradine) could be effective and safe in HTx recipients. The primary objective of this open-label randomized clinical trial was to compare the mean HR at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months after randomization between an ivabradine plus conventional treatment group (IG) and conventional treatment alone group (CG). The secondary objectives were reduction in mortality, graft dysfunction, and ventricular mass. All patients were randomized between 1 and 12 months after HTx. Ivabradine started at randomization. Of the 35 patients, 54.28% were in the CG and 45.72% in the IG. There were no significant between-group differences in demographics. Over time, the HR differences between the groups became significant (P < .01). There were no significant between-group differences in mortality, graft dysfunction, and ventricular mass. We conclude that ivabradine could effectively and consistently reduce the HR in HTx recipients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Heart transplant recipients (n=35). Ivabradine plus conventional treatment vs. Conventional treatment alone was evaluated on Mean heart rate at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months after randomization (p=<.01). Ivabradine plus conventional treatment significantly reduced mean heart rate over 36 months compared to conventional treatment alone in heart transplant recipients (P < .01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: