Key result
Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a lower risk of clinically significant eGFR decline (OR 0.529; 95% CI 0.343-0.817; p=0.004) compared to warfarin in Asian patients with NVAF.
Why the study?
DOACs have been linked to better renal outcomes than warfarin in NVAF, but renal function outcomes comparing warfarin and DOAC in Asian NVAF patients needed evaluation.
Do direct oral anticoagulants reduce the risk of renal function decline compared to warfarin in Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=766)
Yes
Do direct oral anticoagulants reduce the risk of renal function decline compared to warfarin in Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
In Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, DOACs (specifically rivaroxaban and dabigatran) are associated with a lower risk of significant renal function decline compared to warfarin.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support DOAC preference for renal preservation in Asian NVAF; extends observational data but leaves confirmation to RCTs.
Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been linked to better renal outcomes than warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We aimed to compare the renal function outcomes in Asian NVAF patients treated with warfarin and DOAC. Methods This multicentre retrospective study analysed NVAF patients newly initiated on oral anticoagulant (OAC) from 2013 to 2022 across seven tertiary hospitals. Using propensity-score matching, warfarin and DOAC recipients were matched by incorporating 22 variables potentially affecting renal outcomes. Primary endpoints include clinically significant (≥30%) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline and worsened chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage. Results A total of 766 subjects (383 warfarin; 383 DOAC; mean age 70.7 ± 9.6 years) were analysed. Baseline eGFR was 75.0 (59.0–89.0) for warfarin and 76.0 (59.0–88.0) ml/min/1.73 m 2 for DOAC groups. Following median OAC treatment of 2.8 ± 1.6 years, 14.5% experienced clinically significant eGFR decline and 31.9% had worsened CKD stage. DOAC was associated with a lower risk of clinically significant eGFR decline (OR 0.529, 95% CI 0.343–0.817, p = 0.004) and worsened CKD stage (OR 0.713, 95% CI 0.521–0.975, p = 0.034). In subgroup analysis, rivaroxaban (OR 0.337, 95% CI 0.157–0.724, p = 0.005) and dabigatran (OR 0.516, 95% CI 0.285–0.934, p = 0.029), but not apixaban (OR 0.759, 95% CI 0.432–1.333, p = 0.338), were associated with a lower risk of clinically significant eGFR decline. Conclusions Significant renal function decline is common during follow-up of Asian NVAF patients on OAC. Among the DOACs, rivaroxaban and dabigatran, but not apixaban, were associated with a lower risk of renal function decline than warfarin. These findings warrant confirmation in prospective randomised studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koh et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=766). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. warfarin was evaluated on clinically significant (≥30%) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline (OR 0.529, 95% CI 0.343-0.817, p=0.004). Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a lower risk of clinically significant eGFR decline (OR 0.529; 95% CI 0.343-0.817; p=0.004) compared to warfarin in Asian patients with NVAF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: