Key result
NOACs show no difference in significant eGFR decline vs. warfarin, despite slowing annual renal decline.
Why the study?
Cumulative data suggested some oral anticoagulants may exert favorable renal outcomes, motivating evaluation of renal outcomes in patients with AF receiving oral anticoagulation.
Do non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants reduce renal function decline compared to warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=734)
No
Do non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants reduce renal function decline compared to warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, NOACs (particularly rivaroxaban and dabigatran) are associated with a significantly slower annual decline in eGFR compared to warfarin, despite similar rates of severe (>30%) eGFR drops.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
NOACs were associated with slower annual eGFR decline versus warfarin in AF without differing in severe decline risk; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Oral anticoagulants decreased stroke and mortality in atrial fibrillation patients. There have been cumulative data suggesting that some oral anticoagulants may exert favorable renal outcomes.The aim of this study is to evaluate the renal outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation who took oral anticoagulant. METHODS: A Retrospective cohort study using hospital electronic database. Serum creatinine and GFR were collected at baseline and at 1 and 2 years. RESULTS: Authors identified 734 patients with non-valvular AF who took oral anticoagulants. At the end of 2-year, the cumulative risk of significant GFR decline (eGFR drop > 30%) was 10.94% in warfarin group and 9.69% in NOACs group.The incidence rate of significant eGFR decline were comparable between NOACs and warfarin group which were 4.82 and 5.34 per 100-patient year respectively(HR 1.01 CI 0.62-1.66 , p- value 0.964).However, the adjusted mean eGFR change per year was significantly lower in NOAC group, especially rivaroxaban (coefficient 7.83 ,CI 4.44 11.22 , p-value < 0.001) and dabigatran (coefficient 6.22 ,CI 2.67-9.77 , p-value = 0.001) at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Significant GFR decline was not uncommon in non-valvular AF patients who received anticoagulant. Among these, the proportion of patients who had significant eGFR decline(>30%) were comparable between NOACs and warfarin at 2 years. However, there is a significantly less mean eGFR decline per year in patients who receive NOACs, notably with dabigatran and rivaroxaban, than those who receive warfarin.The findings of this study should be interpreted in the context of patients included in this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chantrarat et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=734). Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Significant eGFR decline (>30% decline in GFR) at 2 years (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.62-1.66, p=0.964).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: