Key result
Direct oral anticoagulants reduced the risks of acute kidney injury (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.82-0.91) and CKD progression (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.92) compared with vitamin K antagonists in AF patients.
Why the study?
Whether DOAC use is associated with lower risks of kidney complications compared with VKAs in patients with atrial fibrillation remains unclear.
Does DOAC use reduce the risk of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease progression in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to vitamin K antagonists?
Cohort (n=32,781)
Yes
Does DOAC use reduce the risk of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease progression in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to vitamin K antagonists?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients with atrial fibrillation, initiation of DOACs is associated with a decreased risk of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease progression compared with VKAs.
Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended as first-line treatment of atrial fibrillation. Whether DOAC use is associated with lower risks of kidney complications compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) remains unclear. We examined this association in a nationwide, population-based cohort study. Methods: We conducted a cohort study including patients initiating oral anticoagulant treatment within 3 months after an atrial fibrillation diagnosis in Denmark during 2012-18. Using routinely collected creatinine measurements from laboratory databases, we followed patients in an intention-to-treat approach for acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. We used propensity-score weighting to balance baseline confounders, computed weighted risks and weighted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing DOACs with VKAs. We performed several subgroup analyses and a per-protocol analysis. The weighted 1-year risks of AKI were 13.6% in DOAC users and 15.0% in VKA users (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.82; 0.91). The weighted 5-year risks of CKD progression were 13.9% in DOAC users and 15.4% in VKA users (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79; 0.92). Results were similar across subgroups and in the per-protocol analysis. Conclusions: Initiation of DOACs was associated with a decreased risk of AKI and CKD progression compared with VKAs. Despite the potential limitations of observational studies, our findings support the need for increased clinical awareness to prevent kidney complications among patients who initiate oral anticoagulants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vestergaard et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=32,781). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated on Acute kidney injury (AKI) at 1 year (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.82-0.91). Direct oral anticoagulants reduced the risks of acute kidney injury (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.82-0.91) and CKD progression (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.92) compared with vitamin K antagonists in AF patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: