Key result
Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.47) and cardiovascular events across all stages of chronic kidney disease compared to vitamin K antagonists.
Why the study?
DOACs are increasingly used in AF with CKD, but limited evidence exists regarding clinical outcomes in advanced CKD.
Does direct oral anticoagulant use reduce all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation and moderate to severe chronic kidney disease?
Cohort (n=4,849)
Yes
Does direct oral anticoagulant use reduce all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation and moderate to severe chronic kidney disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In real-world patients with atrial fibrillation and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease, DOACs are associated with significantly lower mortality and cardiovascular events compared to VKAs, without an increased risk of bleeding.
BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) often coexists in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), worsening patients' prognosis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used also in patients with AF and CKD, but limited evidence exists regarding outcomes in advanced CKD. METHODS: . The association of DOACs or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) use with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events (CVEs), and bleedings was assessed using Cox regression and Fine-Gray competing risk models. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to confirm the robustness of the analysis. RESULTS: Among 4849 patients with AF and CKD, the mean age was 81.5 ± 6.7 years, 57.9% were women, and 55.8% were on DOACs. DOAC (vs. VKAs) was inversely associated with all-cause mortality in group 1 (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.67, p < 0.001), group 2 (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.31-0.58, p < 0.001), and group 3 (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.10-0.39, p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained for CVEs (sHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49-0.85, p = 0.002 for group 1, sHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42-0.75, p < 0.001 for group 2, sHR 0.31, 95% CI 0.17-0.55, p < 0.001 for group 3), while no differences emerged for bleedings. No significant differences were observed among DOACs. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world contemporary cohort of patients with AF receiving oral anticoagulants, DOAC use was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events across all stages of CKD. Trial registration NCT02219984.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menichelli et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation with moderate/severe chronic kidney disease (n=4,849). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (propensity score-matched cohort) (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.37-0.59, p=<0.001). Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.47) and cardiovascular events across all stages of chronic kidney disease compared to vitamin K antagonists.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: