Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
// Abhishek A. Singh 1 , Amit Mandoli 1 , Koen H.M. Prange 1 , Marko Laakso 2 , Joost H.A. Martens 1 1 Radboud University, Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands 2 Genome Scale Biology Research Program, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Correspondence to: Joost Martens, email: j.martens@ncmls.ru.nl Keywords: AML, PML-RARA, AML1-ETO, CBFB-MYH11, RUNX1 Received: July 05, 2016 Accepted: November 21, 2016 Published: December 24, 2016 ABSTRACT Chromosomal translocations are one of the hallmarks of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), often leading to gene fusions and expression of an oncofusion protein. Over recent years it has become clear that most of the AML associated oncofusion proteins molecularly adopt distinct mechanisms for inducing leukemogenesis. Still these unique molecular properties of the chimeric proteins converge and give rise to a common pathogenic molecular mechanism. In the present study we compared genome-wide DNA binding and transcriptome data associated with AML1-ETO, CBFB-MYH11 and PML-RARA oncofusion protein expression to identify unique and common features. Our analyses revealed targeting of oncofusion binding sites to RUNX1 and ETS-factor occupied genomic regions. In addition, it revealed a highly comparable global histone acetylation pattern, similar expression of common target genes and related enrichment of several biological pathways critical for maintenance of AML, suggesting oncofusion proteins deregulate common gene programs despite their distinct binding signatures and mechanisms of action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: