Key result
A nursing educational intervention program significantly improved patients' knowledge (from 3.3% to 75.0%) and practices (from 1.7% to 75.0%) regarding heart failure at 3-month follow-up (p<0.001).
Why the study?
Fluid and electrolyte imbalance in cardiac patients is often life-threatening yet preventable, making maintenance of balance critical to achieving optimal cardiac function in CHF.
Does a nursing educational health promotion program improve knowledge, self-care practices, and fluid balance in patients with congestive heart failure?
Does a nursing educational health promotion program improve knowledge, self-care practices, and fluid balance in patients with congestive heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 75% vs 3.3%
p-value: p=<0.001
A nursing educational intervention significantly improved knowledge, self-care practices, and reduced edema in patients with congestive heart failure.
Fluid-electrolyte vigilance remains essential in cardiac patients; Level 5 data leaves open targeted prevention trials.
Fluid and electrolyte imbalance in the patient with cardiovascular dysfunction is a common complication of cardiac disease. Cardiovascular diseases remain the number one cause of death i today. Recovery from these diseases requires careful attention to the factors that influence heart status. Fluid and electrolyte imbalance in the cardiac patient often is both life-threatening and preventable. Maintaining a homeostatic environment in terms of fluid and electrolyte balance is critical to achieving optimal cardiac function in all heart patients. Aim of study: to evaluate the effect of nursing intervention program on maintaining fluid and electrolyte balance among patients with congestive heart failure. Subjects and Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted in the outpatient clinics of the cardiology department at Zagazig University Hospitals on 60 patients suffering from CHF. The tools used in data collection were an interview questionnaire form for knowledge and observation checklists for practice, in addition to an input/output sheet. The researcher prepared the educational health promotion program, implemented it, and measured its immediate and 3-month follow-up effects. Results: Patients’ age ranged between 33 and 85 years, with 55.0% males. Patients’ knowledge improved from 3.3% pre-intervention to 81.7% post-intervention phase, and 75.0% at the follow-up (p<0.001). Their practices improved from 1.7% pre-intervention to 81.7% post-intervention, and 75.0% at follow-up (p<0.001). The prevalence of edema decreased from 73.3% pre-intervention to 26.7% at follow-up (p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, the study intervention was the main positive predictor of the knowledge and practice scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salama et al. (2022) studied Congestive heart failure (n=60). Nursing educational health promotion program vs. Pre-intervention baseline was evaluated on Patients' knowledge (p=<0.001). A nursing educational intervention program significantly improved patients' knowledge (from 3.3% to 75.0%) and practices (from 1.7% to 75.0%) regarding heart failure at 3-month follow-up (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: