Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This personal analysis of the revision process of the ICIDH is set in the context of the international disability movement. With analogies to feminism, it shows how the medicalisation of disability is itself disablism and, while recognising many flaws in the revised version, encourages the disability movement to use the new version to its own advantage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rachel Hurst (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: