Why the study?
Does carotid artery plaque burden and stiffness predict all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in elderly men?
Does carotid artery plaque burden and stiffness predict all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in elderly men?
Carotid artery plaque burden, but not stiffness, is a strong independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in elderly men, adding prognostic value to standard risk assessment.
May refine mortality risk stratification in elderly men; extends observational data but requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Indicators of carotid atherosclerosis may confer additional prognostic value and guide clinicians in cardiovascular risk assessment. Carotid artery morphology (plaque burden) and function (stiffness indexes) as predictors of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were prospectively evaluated in elderly men. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiovascular risk profile was measured in 367 independently living men (mean+/- SD age, 78+/-4 years). The number of carotid plaques was assessed by B-mode ultrasound, and arterial stiffness was quantified with a wall tracker system. During 48 months of follow-up, 70 deaths (28 cardiovascular) occurred. The total number of carotid plaques was the parameter most closely related to prognosis. In the age-adjusted multivariate Cox model, all-cause mortality was predicted by number of plaques (hazard ratio [HR] per 1-unit increase, 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12 to 1.64). Predictors of cardiovascular mortality in the respective model were number of plaques (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.33) and Young's elastic modulus (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.26). Number of plaques improved the prognostic utility in any prognosis model when added to commonly available cardiovascular risk information. In contrast, stiffness indexes offered no consistent additive value. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly men, carotid artery plaque burden is a strong independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the years to come. The additional value of carotid artery stiffness measurements as a pathophysiologically related entity appears to be limited in this age group and, if anything, confined to cardiovascular mortality risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Störk et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: