Why the study?
Does nicorandil reduce the composite of coronary heart disease death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned hospitalisation for cardiac chest pain in patients with stable angina?
Does nicorandil reduce the composite of coronary heart disease death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned hospitalisation for cardiac chest pain in patients with stable angina?
Nicorandil added to standard anti-anginal therapy significantly reduces cardiovascular events in patients with stable angina, with consistent benefits across various clinical subgroups.
Supports adding nicorandil to anti-anginal therapy in stable angina; confirms major event reduction in this RCT population.
AIMS: IONA (impact of nicorandil in angina) is a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial of nicorandil, with a target dose of 20 mg twice daily. The consistency of benefits seen in subgroups is reported. METHODS: The primary composite end point of the study was coronary heart disease death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned hospitalisation for cardiac chest pain. Subgroups were defined using baseline characteristics including, age, sex, histories of smoking, diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction, revascularisation, anginal status, anti-anginal treatment, other cardiovascular drugs, and an overall assessment of risk. RESULTS: A total of 5126 patients were randomised to receive nicorandil or identical placebo in addition to standard anti-anginal treatment. Overall, nicorandil reduced the incidence of the primary end point from 15.5% to 13.1% (hazard ratio (HR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 0.97; p = 0.014). There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity of benefit across all subgroups studied. The absolute risk reduction was greatest and the numbers needed to treat to prevent one event was lowest in subjects at greatest risk. CONCLUSIONS: The IONA study demonstrates a significant improvement in outcome by nicorandil treatment across a broad range of patients with stable angina.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2004 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: