Key result
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring reduced sleep efficiency and increased sedentary time, characteristics that may induce nondipping.
Why the study?
Does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring affect sleep duration, sleep efficiency, and daytime activity in veterans with chronic kidney disease?
Observational (n=103)
Does ambulatory blood pressure monitoring affect sleep duration, sleep efficiency, and daytime activity in veterans with chronic kidney disease?
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring itself disturbs sleep and reduces physical activity, which may induce nondipping and confound the prognostic value of the dipping phenomenon.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ABPM may confound nondipping assessment via sleep disruption in CKD; leaves open its impact on prognostic accuracy.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring is commonly used to assess the circadian pattern of BP. Circadian BP pattern is influenced by physical activity and sleep cycle. The effect of BP monitoring itself on the level of physical activity and sleep remains unknown. If BP monitoring affects these parameters, then monitoring itself may influence the circadian BP pattern. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: To assess the effect of ambulatory BP monitoring on sleep duration, sleep efficiency, and daytime activity, we measured physical activity using wrist actigraphy in 103 veterans with chronic kidney disease. After 6 to 7 days of continuous activity monitoring, participants underwent ambulatory BP monitoring with simultaneous actigraphy. The above experiment was repeated after 1 mo. RESULTS: Among the top tertile of patients (most sleep), when wearing ambulatory BP patients spent less time in bed at night (-92 min, P < 0.0001), were less asleep during those hours (-98 min, P < 0.0001), and had reduced sleep efficiency (82% versus 77%, -5% P = 0.02). On the day of ambulatory BP monitoring, patients were more sedentary during waking hours (+27 minutes, P = 0.002). During ambulatory BP monitoring, waking after sleep onset more than median was associated with greater odds for nondipping (odds ratio 10.5, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory BP monitoring is associated with disturbed sleep and reduced physical activity, characteristics that influence dipping. Ambulatory BP monitoring may itself induce nondipping and may thus mitigate the prognostic significance of the dipping phenomenon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agarwal et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Chronic kidney disease (n=103). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring vs. Days without ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was evaluated on Sleep efficiency (among top tertile of patients) (MD -5%, p=0.02). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring reduced sleep efficiency and increased sedentary time, characteristics that may induce nondipping.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: