Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: There are few data on the association between health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and objectively-measured physical activity (PA) in non-westernised populations, especially the older population. Furthermore, in light of recent accelerometer models introduced in the market which assess acceleration in three axes, we theorised a population study using cut-points based on composite vector magnitude (VM) is needed. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the associations between tri-axial accelerometer-determined PA and HRQoL in community-dwelling older Malay adults, using cut-points for VM. Method: The study design was cross-sectional, involving 146 community-dwelling older Malay adults (aged 60 to 85 years old) living in Seberang Perai Utara, Penang, Malaysia. PA data was collected using tri-axial accelerometers (Actigraph GT3X or GT3X+) worn around the hip during waking hours for 7 days, and the intensities were categorised using cut-points for VM. HRQoL was measured using the Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36®) and scored using the norm-based scoring system. Analyses included gender differences in PA variables and HRQoL; and correlation (Spearman’s rho) between PA and HRQoL. Results: Significant positive association was found between moderate PA and bodily pain, but only for men (rho=0.263, p<0.05). Men scored higher in all eight domains of SF-36®, but significantly higher in norm-based physical functioning (p<0.05) and vitality (p<0.05), compared to women. When scored using 0-100 scales, it was found that men scored significantly higher on four domains of SF-36® compared to women: PF (p<0.05), BP (p<0.001), VIT (p<0.05), and MH (p<0.05). There were no gender differences found in overall activity counts. Conclusion: In this sample population, tri-axial accelerometer-determined PA has minimal association to the domains of health, and men are likely to have better self-perceived of health compared to women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abidin et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: