Key result
Transthoracic echocardiography measurements of proximal aorta diameters were significantly correlated with cardiac magnetic resonance (r=0.931 for sinuses of Valsalva, r=0.949 for ascending aorta).
Why the study?
Does transthoracic echocardiography accurately measure proximal thoracic aorta diameters compared to cardiac magnetic resonance in hypertensive patients?
Observational (n=75)
Does transthoracic echocardiography accurately measure proximal thoracic aorta diameters compared to cardiac magnetic resonance in hypertensive patients?
Transthoracic echocardiography is a reliable and accurate tool for assessing proximal aorta diameters in hypertensive patients when compared to cardiac magnetic resonance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TTE may suffice for proximal aortic monitoring in hypertension when CMR is unavailable; supports validation but leaves open questions on long-term reproducibility.
BACKGROUND: Accurate and reproducible measurements of proximal thoracic aorta diameters are essential in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with aortic dilatation, a condition particularly common in hypertensive patients. AIM: to evaluate the accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for the assessment of proximal thoracic aorta diameters in a cohort of hypertensive patients. METHODS: A total of 75 essential hypertensive outpatients previously evaluated by TTE and than by CMR were included in the study. We specifically compared the two techniques at the level of sinuses of Valsalva (SoV) and ascending aorta (Asc) diameter. For the TTE images, the inner edge-to-inner edge and leading edge-to-leading edge conventions were compared. RESULTS: TTE and CMR diameters were significantly related (SoV: r 0.931, P < 0.001; Asc: r 0.949, P < 0.001) when the leading edge-to-leading edge convention was used. Mean difference between CMR and TTE diameters was 2.49 ± 2.01 mm at the level of SoV and 1.13 ± 1.77 mm at the level of Asc. Correlation was good also for the TEE diameters measured by inner edge-to-inner edge convention (SoV: r 0.936, P < 0.001; Asc: r 0.947, P < 0.001). Comparing the two approaches in the evaluation of Asc, inner edge-to-inner edge showed a trend to a better correlation with CMR measurements than leading edge-to-leading edge, with a good interobserver and intraobserver agreement. CONCLUSION: The results of the current study suggest that TTE could be a reliable tool to assess proximal aorta diameters in hypertensive patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leone et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Essential hypertension (n=75). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) vs. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was evaluated on Correlation of proximal thoracic aorta diameters at the level of sinuses of Valsalva (SoV) and ascending aorta (Asc) (r 0.949, p=<0.001). Transthoracic echocardiography measurements of proximal aorta diameters were significantly correlated with cardiac magnetic resonance (r=0.931 for sinuses of Valsalva, r=0.949 for ascending aorta).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: