Key result
Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to a pre-ERAS cohort (20% vs. 39%, p=0.001).
Why the study?
Postoperative atrial fibrillation is the most frequent arrhythmic complication following cardiac surgery and is linked to increased morbidity and prolonged recovery, prompting evaluation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program.
Does an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Cohort (n=483)
No
Does an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 20% vs 39%
p-value: p=0.001
Implementation of a structured ERAS protocol in cardiac surgery significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation and improves overall postoperative recovery.
ERAS was associated with lower POAF after cardiac surgery; leaves open whether RCTs will confirm benefit.
Background/Objectives: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most frequent arrhythmic complication following cardiac surgery and is associated with increased morbidity and prolonged recovery. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program on the incidence of POAF and broader perioperative outcomes. Methods: In this monocentric, observational cohort study, we compared a retrospective pre-ERAS cohort (n = 162) with a prospective ERAS cohort (n = 321). The primary outcome was the incidence of POAF, assessed using two definitions: (1) the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) 2014 clinical definition, identifying POAF as atrial fibrillation requiring treatment; and (2) the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2024 definition, describing new-onset atrial fibrillation occurring immediately after surgery. Secondary outcomes included compliance with POAF prophylaxis measures, length of hospital stay, and the occurrence of postoperative complications. Statistical analyses included propensity score matching and multivariate logistic regression to identify independent predictors of POAF. Results: ERAS implementation was associated with a significant reduction in POAF incidence across both definitions. According to the AATS 2014 definition, POAF occurred in 20% of ERAS patients vs. 39% in the pre-ERAS group (p = 0.001), and 23% vs. 39% in the matched cohort (p = 0.004). Using the ESC 2024 definition, POAF was observed in 21% vs. 37% (p = 0.001) in unmatched and 20% vs. 36% (p = 0.005) in matched populations. Compliance with POAF prophylaxis improved markedly in the ERAS group (70% vs. 21%, p = 0.001). ERAS patients also experienced shorter hospital stays and fewer postoperative complications (26% vs. 38% in the matched cohort, p = 0.033). Conclusions: The implementation of a structured ERAS protocol significantly reduced POAF incidence, improved compliance with preventive strategies, and enhanced key aspects of postoperative recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niessen et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Postoperative atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery (n=483). Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program vs. Retrospective pre-ERAS cohort was evaluated on Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AATS 2014 definition) (p=0.001). Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to a pre-ERAS cohort (20% vs. 39%, p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: