Key result
Abemaciclib linked to ~7% thrombosis incidence in real-world metastatic breast cancer.
Why the study?
Increased venous thromboembolism rates in clinical trials led to a black-box warning for abemaciclib, but thrombosis rates in unselected real-world populations remained ill defined.
What is the real-world incidence and mortality impact of venous and arterial thrombosis in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving abemaciclib?
Cohort (n=364)
Yes
What is the real-world incidence and mortality impact of venous and arterial thrombosis in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving abemaciclib?
Real-world patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with abemaciclib experience venous and arterial thrombosis rates roughly two- to three-fold higher than reported in clinical trials, and developing VTE is associated with doubled mortality risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports thrombosis monitoring in abemaciclib-treated metastatic breast cancer; leaves open whether prophylaxis alters outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib is a mainstay of treatment for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. However, increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates in multiple clinical trials resulted in a black-box warning for this agent. Thrombosis rates in unselected real-world populations receiving abemaciclib remain ill defined. METHODS: A multicenter observational cohort study was conducted of patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving abemaciclib. The primary end point was thrombosis during treatment or within 30 days of discontinuation. Multivariable logistic models assessed predictors of VTE, and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model assessed mortality. RESULTS: A total of 364 patients were included, with a median treatment duration of 5.5 months. Twenty-six patients developed 27 (7.4%) thrombotic events (17 VTE, nine arterial thrombosis, and one with both events). No baseline characteristics were associated with increased VTE risk in multivariable modeling. Patients developing VTE during therapy had a higher risk of death than those who did not (hazard ratio, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.07-4.13). Median survival in patients who developed VTE compared with those who did not was 9.6 vs 25.8 months, respectively. The rate of VTE and any thrombosis during abemaciclib therapy was 9.1 and 13.7 events per 100 person-years, respectively, which is notably higher than rates observed in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, abemaciclib was associated with a VTE rate approximately two-fold greater than the already elevated rates reported in the MONARCH trials. Patients developing thrombosis on abemaciclib had a significantly higher risk of death. Given these findings, studies evaluating the role of thromboprophylaxis in patients receiving abemaciclib are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watson et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (n=364). Abemaciclib therapy was evaluated on Venous and/or arterial thrombosis during abemaciclib treatment or within 30 days of discontinuation. Abemaciclib therapy in a real-world metastatic breast cancer cohort was associated with a 7.4% incidence of thrombosis (13.7 events per 100 person-years), and VTE doubled mortality risk (HR 2.09).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: