Key result
CARE-CITE achieves ~100% retention and adherence with descriptive functional gains in chronic stroke dyads.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: This feasibility study evaluated a theory-based intervention (CARE-CITE) designed to engage carepartners (CPs) in supporting stroke survivor upper extremity rehabilitation. DESIGN: The study was a one-group design with pre- and posttest and 1 month follow-up (N = 7 dyads). METHODS: Feasibility was determined by participant retention, CP and stroke survivor intervention adherence, and CP acceptability of the intervention (exit interview). Measures of CP depressive symptoms, fatigue, and family conflict around stroke recovery and stroke survivor upper extremity function are reported. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. FINDINGS: All participants completed the study and adhered to the intervention, and CPs found CARE-CITE helpful. Descriptively, better scores were observed for CP's mental health, family conflict, stroke survivor confidence, and upper extremity tasks performed. CONCLUSION: These results provide initial evidence that CARE-CITE is feasible after chronic stroke and that CPs and stroke survivors may benefit from family-centered care. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Improving CP skills in supporting rehabilitation activities may improve stroke survivor upper extremity function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blanton et al. (2018) studied Chronic stroke (n=14). CARE-CITE (family-centered care during constraint-induced therapy) was evaluated on Feasibility (participant retention, intervention adherence, and carepartner acceptability). CARE-CITE achieved 100% retention and adherence across 7 chronic stroke survivor-carepartner dyads, with descriptive improvements in mental health and upper extremity function.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: