Key result
Implantation of two devices for left atrial appendage occlusion achieved complete closure in all 5 patients with no complications, strokes, or device embolisations after 14 patient-years.
Why the study?
Does the implantation of a second device achieve complete LAA occlusion in NVAF patients with significant residual leaks after initial device implantation?
Case Report (n=5)
Does the implantation of a second device achieve complete LAA occlusion in NVAF patients with significant residual leaks after initial device implantation?
Implantation of a second device is a feasible and safe strategy to achieve complete LAA occlusion in patients with complex anatomy or residual leaks after initial device placement.
May support dual-device LAAO in complex anatomy; hypothesis-generating and requires larger prospective validation.
AIMS: Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is an alternative to oral anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Due to the great anatomic variability of the LAA, complete closure may not always be obtained with a single device. We report cases in which adequate closure of the LAA was achieved with implantation of two devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five out of 223 consecutive patients who underwent LAA occlusion without guidance with transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) had a second device implanted to treat significant residual leaks or uncovered parts of the LAA after first device implantation. All procedures were successful, with no complications. Two patients received two AMPLATZER Cardiac Plugs (ACP); one patient received one ACP and one AMPLATZER Vascular Plug; one patient received one AMPLATZER Septal Occluder (ASO) and one ACP prototype; and one patient received two ASOs. TOE performed at least four months after the procedure showed complete closure of the LAA in all patients, without thrombus formation on the devices. After 14 patient-years there were no strokes, peripheral thromboemboli, or device embolisations. CONCLUSIONS: When necessary, the implantation of two devices to achieve complete LAA occlusion in patients with NVAF is feasible and leads to favourable results during follow-up. Potentially, this technical innovation may widen LAA occlusion indications by permitting occlusion of LAAs with large ostia or complex anatomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guérios et al. (2015) conducted a case report in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) (n=5). Double device left atrial appendage closure was evaluated on Complete closure of the LAA and absence of complications. Implantation of two devices for left atrial appendage occlusion achieved complete closure in all 5 patients with no complications, strokes, or device embolisations after 14 patient-years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: