Key result
Left atrial appendage closure using an oversized WATCHMAN device and 45-day DAPT resulted in a 3.3% rate of pericardial effusions, 5% rate of device thrombi, and no device embolizations.
Why the study?
Does WATCHMAN device implantation with larger sizing and post-procedural DAPT improve safety in patients with contraindications to warfarin?
Population
n=59 consecutive patients treated with the WATCHMAN device, including those with contraindications to warfarin
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
6 months
Authors
Loading...
May support oversized WATCHMAN with short DAPT in warfarin-contraindicated patients; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized trials before practice change.
Observational (n=59)
Does WATCHMAN device implantation with larger sizing and post-procedural DAPT improve safety in patients with contraindications to warfarin?
In patients with contraindications to warfarin, WATCHMAN implantation using larger device sizing and 45-day DAPT appears safe and minimizes leakage.
Meincke et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Contraindication to warfarin requiring left atrial appendage closure (n=59). WATCHMAN device (oversized 15-30%) and dual antiplatelet therapy was evaluated on Periprocedural safety (pericardial effusions, thrombi, and device embolizations). Left atrial appendage closure using an oversized WATCHMAN device and 45-day DAPT resulted in a 3.3% rate of pericardial effusions, 5% rate of device thrombi, and no device embolizations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: