Key result
Linagliptin reduced smooth muscle cell proliferation and modulated inflammation, but did not affect neointima formation or reendothelialization after arterial injury in healthy and diabetic rats.
Why the study?
Does linagliptin improve vessel wall healing and accelerate reendothelialization after arterial injury in healthy and diabetic rats?
Does linagliptin improve vessel wall healing and accelerate reendothelialization after arterial injury in healthy and diabetic rats?
Linagliptin exhibits antiproliferative and anti-inflammatory effects on smooth muscle cells but does not improve vessel wall healing or reendothelialization after arterial injury in rat models.
Linagliptin’s anti-proliferative effects do not limit neointima in rat models; hypothesis-generating for DPP-4 inhibition in vascular injury.
Diabetic patients suffer an increased risk of restenosis and late stent thrombosis after angioplasty, complications which are related to a defective reendothelialization. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors have been suggested to exert a direct effect on endothelial and smooth muscle cells (SMCs). Therefore, the objective was to study if the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin could influence vascular repair and accelerate reendothelialization after arterial injury in healthy and diabetic animals. Diabetic Goto-Kakizaki and healthy Wistar rats were subjected to arterial injury and treated with linagliptin or vehicle. Vessel wall healing was monitored noninvasively using ultrasound, and on sacrifice, with Evans blue staining and immunohistochemistry. The effect of linagliptin on SMCs was also studied in vitro. We found that linagliptin reduced the proliferation and dedifferentiation of SMCs in vitro, and modulated the inflammatory response in the SMCs after arterial injury in vivo. However, these effects of linagliptin did not affect the neointima formation or the reendothelialization under normal and diabetic conditions. Although linagliptin did not influence vessel wall healing, it seems to possess a desirable antiproliferative influence on SMCs in vitro and an antiinflammatory effect in vivo. These pharmacological properties might carry a potential significance for favorable outcome after vascular interventions in diabetic patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eriksson et al. (2016) studied Arterial injury in normal and diabetic conditions. Linagliptin vs. Vehicle was evaluated on Neointima formation and reendothelialization. Linagliptin reduced smooth muscle cell proliferation and modulated inflammation, but did not affect neointima formation or reendothelialization after arterial injury in healthy and diabetic rats.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: