Why the study?
Do single- and biplane ellipsoid models accurately estimate left ventricular ejection fraction and stroke volume compared to short-axis images compensated for through-plane motion in patients undergoing cardiac MRI?
Do single- and biplane ellipsoid models accurately estimate left ventricular ejection fraction and stroke volume compared to short-axis images compensated for through-plane motion in patients undergoing cardiac MRI?
Left ventricular ejection fraction can be adequately estimated using single- and biplane ellipsoid models in cardiac MRI, but stroke volume tends to be overestimated compared to short-axis images.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single- and biplane models may estimate EF in CMR; leaves open accuracy for stroke volume versus compensated short-axis references.
BACKGROUND: In cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), left ventricular stroke volume (SV) and ejection fractions (EF) are occasionally calculated using single-plane and biplane ellipsoid models. In previous studies, the calculated SV and EF using single- and biplane ellipsoid models have been compared to reference values calculated from short-axis (SA) images. In these studies, however, it has been emphasized that through-plane motion of the basal SA images represents an important source of error, which may result in incorrect reference values. PURPOSE: To compare the calculated SV and EF using single-plane and biplane ellipsoid models with SV and EF calculated from SA images in which compensation was made for through-plane motion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A group of 20 patients who underwent MRI examination were included in the study. SV and EF were calculated using the stack of SA images (which had been compensated for through-plane motion) and compared to the SV and EF calculated according to the single- and biplane ellipsoid models. RESULTS: The mean difference between the single-plane model and the reference was -0.3+/-6.5 for EF and 7.2+/-17.1 ml for SV. Corresponding comparison between the biplane method and the reference resulted in a mean difference of 0.3+/-6.1 for EF and 11.8+/-14.9 ml for SV. CONCLUSION: The results from this study show that left ventricular EF can be adequately estimated using the single- and biplane ellipsoid models, while SV tends to be overestimated using both geometrical models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thunberg et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: