Key result
Aortic valve repair in a 49-year-old man with bicuspid aortic valve endocarditis and leaflet perforation resulted in an intact repair and trivial aortic regurgitation at 24 months.
Case Report (n=1)
A systematic, disease-directed approach to aortic valve repair can be successfully applied to complex pathologic conditions, including simultaneous congenital, degenerative, and infectious conditions.
Supports repair feasibility in complex bicuspid endocarditis; hypothesis-generating for systematic approaches in combined pathologies.
Aortic valve repair can be a good option in younger patients who have severe aortic regurgitation. A systematic, disease-directed approach can simplify repair. This case report describes how a simplified approach can be successfully applied to complex pathologic conditions of the aortic valve. A 49-year-old man with a bicuspid aortic valve and a history of endocarditis presented with severe aortic regurgitation and evidence of recurrent infection. Intraoperatively, we found congenital and degenerative aortic anatomy with endocarditis and perforation. We performed aortic valve repair to enable leaflet coaptation and to adjust the coaptation height. After 24 months, the patient remained well, with an intact repair and trivial aortic regurgitation. We describe our systematic repair approach and rationales for targeting repairs to identified lesions. To our knowledge, this is the first description of complex aortic valve repairs in a patient who had simultaneous congenital, degenerative, and infectious conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kent et al. (2014) conducted a case report in Bicuspid aortic valve with severe aortic regurgitation and endocarditis (n=1). Aortic valve repair was evaluated on Clinical status and valve function. Aortic valve repair in a 49-year-old man with bicuspid aortic valve endocarditis and leaflet perforation resulted in an intact repair and trivial aortic regurgitation at 24 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: