Key result
Complete revascularisation in Impella-supported patients with acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock was associated with lower 30-day mortality compared to incomplete revascularisation.
Why the study?
CULPRIT-SHOCK showed no benefit of multivessel revascularisation in AMI-CS, but mechanical circulatory support was rarely used, leaving the impact of Impella-facilitated complete revascularisation uncertain.
Does complete revascularisation reduce 30-day mortality compared to incomplete revascularisation in Impella-supported patients with AMI-CS?
Observational (n=202)
Yes
Does complete revascularisation reduce 30-day mortality compared to incomplete revascularisation in Impella-supported patients with AMI-CS?
In patients with AMI-related cardiogenic shock supported by an Impella microaxial pump, complete revascularisation (especially when Impella is implanted pre-PCI) is associated with significantly lower 30-day mortality compared to incomplete revascularisation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Complete revascularisation with pre-PCI Impella was associated with lower AMI-CS mortality; leaves open whether this strategy improves outcomes in prospective trials.
Background: Acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) still has high likelihood of in-hospital mortality. The only trial evidence currently available for the intra-aortic balloon pump showed no benefit of its routine use in AMI-CS. While a potential benefit of complete revascularisation has been suggested in urgent revascularisation, the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial demonstrated no benefit of multivessel compared to culprit-lesion only revascularisation in AMI-CS. However, mechanical circulatory support was only used in a minority of patients. Objectives: We hypothesised that more complete revascularisation facilitated by Impella support is related to lower mortality in AMI-CS patients. Methods: We analysed data from 202 consecutive Impella-treated AMI-CS patients at four European high-volume shock centres (age 66 ± 11 years, 83% male). Forty-seven percentage ( n = 94) had cardiac arrest before Impella implantation. Revascularisation was categorised as incomplete if residual SYNTAX-score (rS) was >8. Results: Overall 30-day mortality was 47%. Mortality was higher when Impella was implanted post-PCI (Impella-post-PCI: 57%, Impella-pre-PCI: 38%, p = 0.0053) and if revascularisation was incomplete (rS ≤ 8: 37%, rS > 8: 56%, p = 0.0099). Patients with both pre-PCI Impella implantation and complete revascularisation had significantly lower mortality (33%) than those with incomplete revascularisation and implantation post PCI (72%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis suggests that complete revascularisation supported by an Impella microaxial pump implanted prior to PCI is associated with lower mortality than incomplete revascularisation in patients with AMI-CS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schäfer et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) (n=202). Complete revascularisation (residual SYNTAX score ≤ 8) vs. Incomplete revascularisation (residual SYNTAX score > 8) was evaluated on 30-day mortality (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.33-0.85, p=0.0099). Complete revascularisation in Impella-supported patients with acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock was associated with lower 30-day mortality compared to incomplete revascularisation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: