Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Unlike previous studies using untreated metakaolin, this work introduces a chemical activation route that significantly enhances surface charge, porosity, and Cd(II) affinity, providing a more efficient and sustainable pathway for Cd(II) removal. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), zeta potential, Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) were used to analyze the characteristics. The chemically activated metakaolin adsorption performance is attributed to its negative surface (−32 mv), enhanced surface area (258.674 m2/g), pore radius (5.2716 nm), pore volume (0.14 cm³/g), high density of reactive –OH and –Si–O− groups, and improved surface roughness. Different factors that affected the Cd(II) removal on metakaolin were investigated by batch adsorption experiments. The equilibrium values were 35 min contact time, 0.5 g adsorbent dose, pH 9, 25 °C temperature, and 200 rpm shaking speed. The kinetics of Cd(II) sorption were best fitted to the pseudo-second-order model, which yielded an R2 of 0.999 assuming that the rate-limiting step is chemisorption. The Sips model fitted the adsorption isotherms well, indicating that the sorption was heterogeneous and the sorption capacity was 10.7629 mg g−1. The thermodynamic evaluation shows that Cd(II) adsorption is endothermic and spontaneous, with ΔG° ≈ −15.6 kJ/mol, ΔH° ≈ 13 kJ/mol, and ΔS° ≈ 0.083 kJ/mol·K. An individual-stage batch adsorber was designed for the sorption of Cd(II) based on the optimum isotherm. The metakaolin exhibited excellent stability and retained more than 72% of its capacity after five regeneration cycles, demonstrating its potential for industrial-scale and environmentally sustainable remediation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shoair et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: