Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Methane activation is usually assumed to take place on top of metal surfaces or metal clusters. It can also occur at the metal–support interface in metal-supported catalysts with reducible oxides, such as CeO 2 . In the present work, we exploit density functional theory with an additional Hubbard-like parameter (DFT + U ) to calculate the activation of methane at an O site interfacing a Ni 4 metal cluster on a support, CeO 2 (111) surface. Two reaction routes, namely, radical and nonradical routes, are taken into account. We show that the nonradical route is favored with an apparent activation energy of 18.1 kcal/mol, which is lower than that for the radical route by 15.0 kcal/mol. In the nonradical route, the formation of a four-centered transition-state structure is observed while a C–H bond of methane is being cleaved to form an OH moiety and a CH 3 fragment that is being bound to the interfacial Ni atom. It is also found that the interfacial O atoms are out of the CeO 2 surface plane with Ce–O bond distances being much longer than those in the crystalline bulk CeO 2, which allows them to be easily reduced, and hence, the interfacial O atoms become more reactive toward methane, as compared to the surface O atoms. The interactions between Ni 4 cluster and the CeO 2 (111) surface result in the reduction of two Ce 4+ ions to Ce 3+, improving the reducibility of the interfacial O atoms. This should be an important key to the facile methane activation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singha et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: