Key result
CVVHDF extends median circuit lifespan to ~70 hours over CVVH and CVVHD in AKI.
Why the study?
When using calcium-containing replacement fluid, whether regional citrate anticoagulation achieves sufficient anticoagulant effect across different continuous renal replacement therapy modalities was unclear.
Does CVVHDF or CVVHD improve extracorporeal circuit lifespan compared to CVVH in ICU patients with AKI receiving regional citrate anticoagulation with calcium-containing replacement solution?
RCT (n=121)
Open-label
1:1:1 central computer-generated randomized sequence
No
Does CVVHDF or CVVHD improve extracorporeal circuit lifespan compared to CVVH in ICU patients with AKI receiving regional citrate anticoagulation with calcium-containing replacement solution?
p-value: p=<0.001
CVVHDF significantly prolongs extracorporeal circuit lifespan and reduces early circuit failure compared to CVVH and CVVHD in AKI patients receiving regional citrate anticoagulation with calcium-containing replacement solution.
CVVHDF yields longest circuit lifespan in RCA-CRRT with calcium-containing fluid; extends RCT evidence for modality-specific optimization.
OBJECTIVE: Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is recommended as the first choice of anticoagulation strategies in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). However, when using calcium-containing replacement fluid, whether RCA can achieve sufficient anticoagulant effect among different CRRT modalities remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this open-label, three-arm, randomized trial, AKI patients receiving RCA-CRRT with calcium-containing replacement fluids were randomized to continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH), continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) and continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) groups from 2022 to 2023. The primary outcomes were circuit lifespan and early circuit failure. Secondary endpoints included the safety of the three groups and 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were enrolled, with 40 in CVVH group, 40 in CVVHD group, and 41 in CVVHDF group. The circuit lifespan in CVVHDF group (70 h, IQR 65-72) was significantly longer than that in CVVHD (47 h, IQR 31.5-54) and CVVH group (64 h, IQR 46-71) (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, 27 circuits remained patent for 72 h (CVVH: 10/40, 25%; CVVHD: 1/40, 2.5%; CVVHDF: 16/41, 39.02%; P = 0.003). A significantly lower incidence of severe venous chamber thrombosis was observed in the CVVHDF group (2.4%, 1/41) relative to the CVVH (5%, 2/40) and CVVHD (50%, 20/40) groups (P < 0.001). Furthermore, early circuit failure (lifespan < 48 h) was observed in 35 circuits, occurring significantly more frequently in the CVVHD group (52.5%, 21/40) than in either the CVVH (22.5%, 9/40) or CVVHDF (12.2%, 5/41) groups (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggested that RCA-CRRT with calcium-containing replacement solution appeared to be safe and effective, with CVVHDF showing potentially prolonged filter survival compared to alternative modalities, which might support its consideration as a possible option in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ) under the registration number ChiCTR2200061065 on 15 June 2022.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) (n=121). Continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) with regional citrate anticoagulation vs. Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) and continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) was evaluated on Median extracorporeal circuit lifespan (hours) (p=<0.001). Continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) significantly prolonged median circuit lifespan to 70 hours compared to 64 hours with CVVH and 47 hours with CVVHD (P<0.001) in patients with acute kidney injury.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: